8,000 runners, 1,000 towns, and a lot of history

John Mark lights the flame in the Empire Stadium at the end of the 1948 Olympic torch relay

The big Olympic story in the UK this week has been the unveiling of the torch relay route for 2012. The organisers have promised that it will pass within 10 miles of 95% of the country’s population, and that more than 1,000 towns and cities will witness the spectacle on their streets. The announcement has led to a flurry of tweets and press releases as individuals, community groups, and local authorities have expressed their delight at being included or their regret at being passed over. I’m in the former group, as my home city of Winchester is on the route. ‘Excited to hear that Winchester is on the 2012 Olympic torch relay!’, local sports activists @WinchesterFit have tweeted: ‘But what will the city’s Olympic legacy be?’

Legacy is one thing: history is another. 2012 will be the third Olympic torch relay to go through the UK, and each one has its own story and context.

A German postage stamp from 1936

The first was not in 1908, when London held its first Olympic Games, but in 1948. The torch relay was created by the organisers of the Berlin Olympics in 1936 as a way of stressing Nazi Germany’s love of classical antiquity. A flame was lit in Olympia from the rays of the sun, and then a relay team of runners carried it from Greece to Berlin. Leni Riefenstahl included spectacular footage of it in her film Olympia, and the idea caught on. So when London hosted the first post-Berlin Olympic Games in 1948, the planners had to deal with this interesting legacy. They decided to keep the torch relay, and to hold it as a celebration of peace.

Easier said than done: the original route had to be changed because of the Greek Civil War. The final route went through Italy, Switzerland, France, Luxembourg, Belgium, and France again, and then from Dover to Wembley via Canterbury, Guildford, and Windsor. A second relay then took the flame from Wembley to Torquay for the sailing events. This, then, was a relay of reconciliation after the war – seen most obviously in the inclusion of Italy. It was a symbolic act which served to reclaim the Olympic Games from any lingering vestiges of what the Nazis had done to them. It also served to promote the Games, with huge crowds turning out to watch the relay go by.

Britain’s second Olympic torch relay was less comfortable. For 2008, the organisers of the Beijing Olympic Games decided to send the torch around the world, and not just on a direct line from Greece to China. This presented opponents of China’s government – human rights campaigners, pro-Tibet activists and others – with the chance to protest in ways that would not have been possible if the relay had been a purely Chinese affair. In Britain, the torch made a brief but notorious appearance in a 30 mile relay from Wembley Stadium (home of the 1948 Olympic Games) to the O2 Arena in east London, close to the 2012 Olympic Park. For most of us, the abiding memories are not of hope and reconciliation, but of a series of often uncomfortable runners surrounded by blue track-suited Chinese security men running past protesters. Here was a torch relay that was supposed to be a propaganda coup for a dictatorship, but ended up creating far more publicity for the dissidents and opponents of that regime. Beijing’s official website, incidentally, still refers to the relay as a ‘four-month-long Journey of Harmony’. I’m not sure if many Londoners remember it that way.

And so to 2012. This will be the most inclusive torch relay yet, involving 8,000 runners, many of whom are being nominated for their inspirational stories and community roles. It will take in Northern Ireland even though no Olympic sports will happen there, as well as England, Scotland, and Wales. This is the torch relay of the era of devolution and equal opportunities.

Each of these torch relays tells a story. Just as the torches are designed anew for every Olympic Games, so the meanings that the planners attach to the relay itself change over time. The stories are not always heart-warming, as witness the propaganda aims of two dictatorships in this history, but they are certainly worth studying.

Share This Post


Filed under Blog posts

2 Responses to 8,000 runners, 1,000 towns, and a lot of history

  1. Adam

    The torch relay is such a great way to show how the whole country have some sense of connection to the Olympics. Although some towns and counties may not have any events taking place, it is important to show as a nation how we want to touch the lives of everyone involved in the build up, and that includes the nation as a whole. It is important to establish these connections around the country to increase support.

    Furthermore it is important to establish these connections from a historical point of view. In ten, twenty and fifty years when people are looking back we want to be remembered for delivering an Olympics that leaves a legacy for the whole nation, remembering tradition, history and just putting on a damn good show. Talking of history I have had an important (to my heart) issue arise.

    Yesterday The Evening Standard London paper released an article that showed a picture promoting the London 2012 Festival around Tower Bridge. This particular poster that was located on the Northern Line platform at Camden Town has airbrushed out of it the HMS Belfast.

    This is an outrage to me. Something so vital to our English history has been purposefully taken away, not mistakenly removed, removed with intent, for what ever reason/s. I feel this is totally unacceptable. I think we should want to show off our maritime history not airbrush it away for aesthetic reasons.

    • Thanks for this, Adam. The people responsible for the HMS Belfast poster blunder have now apologised, and claimed that it was a design error. Apparently they had landscape and portrait versions, and a designer removed the ship from the landscape one as it clashed with a letter, but they then forgot to put it back in when the portrait layout was used. I can’t see how the original removal for design purposes was justifiable on historical or ethical grounds, and I certainly don’t see how the finished version, which must have gone past many pairs of eyes in the design and approval stages, made it through to publication and display.

      The bigger historical irony that strikes me in this sorry story is that it was a Royal Navy battleship, HMS Bicester, that carried the Olympic torch across the Channel in 1948. The military was essential to the 1948 Olympics, but their legacy is apparently seen as expendable now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>